Antibiotic Resistance Is Associated With Morbidity and Mortality After Decortication for Empyema.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of decortication for empyema demonstrated that patient characteristics are associated with mortality, but the relationship of infectious pathogen to outcome has not been described. Our objective was to analyze the association of microbiology and antibiotic resistance with postoperative mortality after decortication for empyema. We hypothesized that bacterial pathogens, antibiotic resistance, and patient characteristics would all contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Patients undergoing pulmonary decortication for empyema from January 1, 2010 to October 1, 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Cases were matched with microbiology cultures. Outcomes of interest were a composite of death, tracheostomy, initial ventilator support greater than 48 hours, or unexpected intensive care unit readmission. Antibiotic resistance was categorized as present or absent, and the number of antibiotics with resistance was counted for each patient. We describe the relationship of patient characteristics, antibiotic resistance, and microbiology to mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 185 patients underwent decortication, 118 of whom had a diagnosis of primary empyema (63.8%). Positive culture results were present in 79 of 185 patients (43%). The most common isolate was Streptococcus, which was present in 29 of 79 (37%), followed by Staphylococcus in 19 of 79 (24%). Of 79 patients, 11 had fungal infections (13.9%). In addition, 16 of 79 patients had polymicrobial empyema (20%). Of 185 patients, 30 experienced the composite adverse outcome (16.2%). In multivariable regression, the composite adverse outcome was associated with emphysema, Candida in pleural culture, and antibiotic resistance count. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative mortality and morbidity after decortication for empyema is considerable. In this cohort, infections with increasing antibiotic resistance are associated with morbidity and mortality among patients with empyema.

[Evaluation of the use of bovine pericardium in non-anatomical lung resections in dogs]. / Evaluación de la utilidad del pericardio bovino en resecciones pulmonares no anatómicas en perros.

UNLABELLED: In this study we assessed the usefulness, healing, as well as the integration to lung tissue of glutaraldehyde preserved at 0.5% bovine pericardium GPBP and lyophilized (GPBPL), after reinforced resection of lung tissue in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: GPBP and GPBPL were prepared and used to reinforce the suture line of lung resection in 30 mongrel dogs: Group I (n = 6): The GPBP were fixed on the lung with 4-0 polypropylene by thoracotomy. Group II (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group III (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBPL were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group IV (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Group V: The resection and fixed of the GPBPL strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Clinico-radiological evaluation was done until euthanasia of all animals at week 8 postop. Progressive insufflation up to 40 cm H2O of airway pressure was done to evaluated resistance of the heal in the suture line reinforced. Macroscopic, and microscopic examination of the GPBP, GPBPL and lung were evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived the surgical procedure and study time (8 weeks). No airleaks were evident at any time during the study including the insufflation test. Macroscopic examination of the GPBP and GPBPL showed good adaptation to the lung tissue. Microscopically all animals presented good healing with deposition of fibrotic tissue layer on the GPBP and GPBPL. CONCLUSION: GPBP and GPBPL are an adequate materials to reinforce lung staple line, when resection of lung tissue was performed in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy.

Evaluación de la utilidad del pericardio bovino en resecciones pulmonares no anatómicas en perros / Evaluation of the use of bovine pericardium in non-anatomical lung resections in dogs

In this study we assessed the usefulness, healing, as well as the integration to lung tissue of glutaraldehyde preserved at 0.5 bovine pericardium GPBP and lyophilized (GPBPL), after reinforced resection of lung tissue in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: GPBP and GPBPL were prepared and used to reinforce the suture line of lung resection in 30 mongrel dogs: Group I (n = 6): The GPBP were fixed on the lung with 4-0 polypropylene by thoracotomy. Group II (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group III (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBPL were performed with an linear stapler by thoracotomy. Group IV (n = 6): The resection and fixed of the GPBP strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Group V: The resection and fixed of the GPBPL strips were performed with a linear stapler by thoracoscopy. Clinico-radiological evaluation was done until euthanasia of all animals at week 8 postop. Progressive insufflation up to 40 cm H2O of airway pressure was done to evaluated resistance of the heal in the suture line reinforced. Macroscopic, and microscopic examination of the GPBP, GPBPL and lung were evaluated. RESULTS: All animals survived the surgical procedure and study time (8 weeks). No airleaks were evident at any time during the study including the insufflation test. Macroscopic examination of the GPBP and GPBPL showed good adaptation to the lung tissue. Microscopically all animals presented good healing with deposition of fibrotic tissue layer on the GPBP and GPBPL. CONCLUSION: GPBP and GPBPL are an adequate materials to reinforce lung staple line, when resection of lung tissue was performed in dogs by thoracotomy or thoracoscopy.